<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>suspect-devices/circuitpython/esp8266/machine_uart.c, branch 0.9.0</title>
<subtitle>CircuitPython - a Python implementation for teaching coding with microcontrollers</subtitle>
<id>https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/atom?h=0.9.0</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/atom?h=0.9.0'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/'/>
<updated>2016-11-13T21:24:22+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>all: Remove readall() method, which is equivalent to read() w/o args.</title>
<updated>2016-11-13T21:24:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Sokolovsky</name>
<email>pfalcon@users.sourceforge.net</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-13T21:24:22+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=59a1201da959ab01895361c0b5bb8bc1409f2b39'/>
<id>urn:sha1:59a1201da959ab01895361c0b5bb8bc1409f2b39</id>
<content type='text'>
Its addition was due to an early exploration on how to add CPython-like
stream interface. It's clear that it's not needed and just takes up
bytes in all ports.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>esp8266: Rename "machine" module implementation to use contemporary naming.</title>
<updated>2016-11-05T22:30:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Sokolovsky</name>
<email>pfalcon@users.sourceforge.net</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-05T22:30:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=8bc3fc20feca9ebe9e9972aeb6b68a81d792c5df'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8bc3fc20feca9ebe9e9972aeb6b68a81d792c5df</id>
<content type='text'>
Previously they used historical "pyb" affix causing confusion and
inconsistency (there's no "pyb" module in modern ports; but people
took esp8266 port as an example, and "pyb" naming kept proliferating,
while other people complained that source structure is not clear).
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
