<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>suspect-devices/circuitpython/esp8266/machine_uart.c, branch 0.9.4</title>
<subtitle>CircuitPython - a Python implementation for teaching coding with microcontrollers</subtitle>
<id>https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/atom?h=0.9.4</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/atom?h=0.9.4'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/'/>
<updated>2017-04-10T20:32:19+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>Split up nativeio.</title>
<updated>2017-04-10T20:32:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Scott Shawcroft</name>
<email>scott.shawcroft@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-04-10T20:32:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=f28f8ba56809fd56e777eabceae21127f95b89ed'/>
<id>urn:sha1:f28f8ba56809fd56e777eabceae21127f95b89ed</id>
<content type='text'>
This was done to allow greatly granularity when deciding what functionality
is built into each board's build. For example, this way pulseio can be
omitted to allow for something else such as touchio.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>all: Remove readall() method, which is equivalent to read() w/o args.</title>
<updated>2016-11-13T21:24:22+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Sokolovsky</name>
<email>pfalcon@users.sourceforge.net</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-13T21:24:22+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=59a1201da959ab01895361c0b5bb8bc1409f2b39'/>
<id>urn:sha1:59a1201da959ab01895361c0b5bb8bc1409f2b39</id>
<content type='text'>
Its addition was due to an early exploration on how to add CPython-like
stream interface. It's clear that it's not needed and just takes up
bytes in all ports.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>esp8266: Rename "machine" module implementation to use contemporary naming.</title>
<updated>2016-11-05T22:30:19+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Sokolovsky</name>
<email>pfalcon@users.sourceforge.net</email>
</author>
<published>2016-11-05T22:30:19+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=8bc3fc20feca9ebe9e9972aeb6b68a81d792c5df'/>
<id>urn:sha1:8bc3fc20feca9ebe9e9972aeb6b68a81d792c5df</id>
<content type='text'>
Previously they used historical "pyb" affix causing confusion and
inconsistency (there's no "pyb" module in modern ports; but people
took esp8266 port as an example, and "pyb" naming kept proliferating,
while other people complained that source structure is not clear).
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
