<feed xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom'>
<title>suspect-devices/circuitpython/tests/run-bench-tests, branch 2.x</title>
<subtitle>CircuitPython - a Python implementation for teaching coding with microcontrollers</subtitle>
<id>https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/atom?h=2.x</id>
<link rel='self' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/atom?h=2.x'/>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/'/>
<updated>2017-07-31T08:35:40+00:00</updated>
<entry>
<title>all: Use the name MicroPython consistently in comments</title>
<updated>2017-07-31T08:35:40+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Alexander Steffen</name>
<email>devel.20.webmeister@spamgourmet.com</email>
</author>
<published>2017-06-30T07:22:17+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=55f33240f3d7051d4213629e92437a36f1fac50e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:55f33240f3d7051d4213629e92437a36f1fac50e</id>
<content type='text'>
There were several different spellings of MicroPython present in comments,
when there should be only one.
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>tests/run-bench-tests: Process tests in alphabetical order.</title>
<updated>2016-05-01T07:35:24+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Sokolovsky</name>
<email>pfalcon@users.sourceforge.net</email>
</author>
<published>2016-05-01T07:34:18+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=df06e3417594e3753f8213151e959fd84e3ed175'/>
<id>urn:sha1:df06e3417594e3753f8213151e959fd84e3ed175</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>Rename "Micro Python" to "MicroPython" in REPL, help, readme's and misc.</title>
<updated>2015-10-11T23:06:25+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Damien George</name>
<email>damien.p.george@gmail.com</email>
</author>
<published>2015-10-11T23:06:25+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=0334058fa43a8ac7c689007f5824510c2927c5cc'/>
<id>urn:sha1:0334058fa43a8ac7c689007f5824510c2927c5cc</id>
<content type='text'>
</content>
</entry>
<entry>
<title>tests: Add framework for comparative benchmarking.</title>
<updated>2014-05-04T22:24:16+00:00</updated>
<author>
<name>Paul Sokolovsky</name>
<email>pfalcon@users.sourceforge.net</email>
</author>
<published>2014-05-04T22:24:16+00:00</published>
<link rel='alternate' type='text/html' href='https://git.suspectdevices.com/suspect-devices/circuitpython/commit/?id=aaff82afe5a72ec69e05f1e56047d0acfde91d0e'/>
<id>urn:sha1:aaff82afe5a72ec69e05f1e56047d0acfde91d0e</id>
<content type='text'>
Motivation is optimizing handling of various constructs as well as
understanding which constructs are more efficient in MicroPython.
More info: http://forum.micropython.org/viewtopic.php?f=3&amp;t=77

Results are wildly unexpected. For example, "optimization" of range
iteration into while loop makes it twice as slow. Generally, the more
bytecodes, the slower the code.
</content>
</entry>
</feed>
