| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This is to keep the top-level directory clean, to make it clear what is
core and what is a port, and to allow the repository to grow with new ports
in a sustainable way.
|
|
This is to have consistency across the whole repository.
|
|
|
|
There were several different spellings of MicroPython present in comments,
when there should be only one.
|
|
In 1.8, Zephyr made a controversial change of dumping C99 stdint types
and switching to its own types.
|
|
For consistent Pin/Signal class hierarchy. With it, Signal is a proper
(while still ducktyped) subclass of a Pin, and any (direct) usage of Pin
can be replace with Signal.
As stmhal's class is reused both as machine.Pin and legacy pyb.Pin,
high/low methods actually retained there.
|
|
|
|
The integration with Zephyr is fairly clean but as MicroPython Hardware API
requires pin ID to be a single value, but Zephyr operates GPIO in terms of
ports and pins, not just pins, a "hierarchical" ID is required, using tuple
of (port, pin). Port is a string, effectively a device name of a GPIO port,
per Zephyr conventions these are "GPIO_0", "GPIO_1", etc.; pin is integer
number of pin with the port (supposed to be in range 0-31).
Example of pin initialization:
pin = Pin(("GPIO_1", 21), Pin.OUT)
(an LED on FRDM-K64F's Port B, Pin 21).
There is support for in/out pins and pull up/pull down but currently
there is no interrupt support.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul Sokolovsky <paul.sokolovsky@linaro.org>
|
