From ecc88e949ca5e307d22da4605a40d39ea2df9e3b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Damien George Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 00:35:11 +0100 Subject: Change some parts of the core API to use mp_uint_t instead of uint/int. Addressing issue #50, still some way to go yet. --- py/objbool.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) (limited to 'py/objbool.c') diff --git a/py/objbool.c b/py/objbool.c index 72535b297..dbe84d92e 100644 --- a/py/objbool.c +++ b/py/objbool.c @@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ STATIC void bool_print(void (*print)(void *env, const char *fmt, ...), void *env } } -STATIC mp_obj_t bool_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) { +STATIC mp_obj_t bool_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, mp_uint_t n_args, mp_uint_t n_kw, const mp_obj_t *args) { mp_arg_check_num(n_args, n_kw, 0, 1, false); switch (n_args) { @@ -60,7 +60,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t bool_make_new(mp_obj_t type_in, uint n_args, uint n_kw, const mp } } -STATIC mp_obj_t bool_unary_op(int op, mp_obj_t o_in) { +STATIC mp_obj_t bool_unary_op(mp_uint_t op, mp_obj_t o_in) { mp_int_t value = ((mp_obj_bool_t*)o_in)->value; switch (op) { case MP_UNARY_OP_BOOL: return o_in; @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ STATIC mp_obj_t bool_unary_op(int op, mp_obj_t o_in) { } } -STATIC mp_obj_t bool_binary_op(int op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) { +STATIC mp_obj_t bool_binary_op(mp_uint_t op, mp_obj_t lhs_in, mp_obj_t rhs_in) { if (MP_BINARY_OP_OR <= op && op <= MP_BINARY_OP_NOT_EQUAL) { return mp_binary_op(op, MP_OBJ_NEW_SMALL_INT(mp_obj_is_true(lhs_in)), rhs_in); } -- cgit v1.2.3